Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Wednesday, 12 August 2026 Reading Room

World

Google: Rathee's YouTube clip 'defamatory', blocked in India

timesofindia.indiatimes.com ·

Google: Rathee's YouTube clip 'defamatory', blocked in India

Delhi's High Court heard Google's response to a petition alleging that a YouTube video by social media influencer Dhruv Rathee was defamatory and should be blocked in India. The influencer's video, uploaded on March 21, contained statements that allegedly insulted Hindu deities Lord Ram, Lord Krishna, and Goddess Sita. The video garnered millions of views before the Center's grievance appellate committee directed Google to remove it within 24 hours on July 15.

Despite the platform's failure to comply, Google informed the court that it had withheld the video in India due to a directive from the committee. The petitioner, advocate Amita Sachdeva, argued that this was only partial compliance. Sachdeva claimed that Rathee's video contained false, misleading, and provocative statements. The issue of global blocking the video was still pending before a division bench of the High Court.

After being informed that Google had already taken steps to remove the video, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma adjourned the hearing to September 3.

Written by urgent.news from Times of India's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at timesofindia.indiatimes.com →

More in World

A case in which an uncle who had been sexually harassing his niece was beaten up by her and her boyfriend, with the niece brandishing a weapon, has been ruled by the Supreme Court to be a 'justifiable act' - one that did not break the law. The incident occurred in 2017. The victim, Ms A, who was in her 20s at the time, had been sexually harassed by her uncle, Mr B, on multiple occasions over several years. On July 2, 2017, Ms A and her boyfriend, Mr C, confronted Mr B at his home in Seoul. During the argument, Mr B made a threatening remark, saying, “You will be the one who ends up dead.” In response, Mr C physically assaulted Mr B, and Ms A brought out a weapon - a 19cm kitchen knife - from her bag and threatened him. As a result, Mr B suffered a fractured nose and required 14 weeks of medical treatment. The two were indicted for assault and battery and for carrying a deadly weapon. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the actions of Ms A and Mr C constituted a 'justifiable act' under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, which provides that an act that is conducted in accordance with social norms and is deemed reasonable under the circumstances is not a crime. The Supreme Court emphasized that it is necessary to consider the context and circumstances of the case when determining whether an act is justifiable. The court also noted that the lower courts had failed to fully consider the background and circumstances of the case, and that they had made an error in their interpretation of the law. The Supreme Court's decision was made on Thursday.

·hani.co.kr

More from Wednesday 12 August →