Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Darline Graham advances to runoff in South Carolina GOP Senate primary

Sen. Darline Graham will advance to a runoff later this month in the South Carolina GOP primary for Senate, CBS News projects, as she vies to replace her late brother, Sen. Lindsey Graham, on the ticket.

Abstract editorial illustration

Sen. Darline Graham and Rep. Ralph Norman will face off in a runoff later this month in South Carolina's special Republican primary for Senate, according to CBS News projections. This runoff will be held on August 25 if neither candidate secures over 50% of the vote in the initial primary. The primary election saw ten candidates compete for the Republican nomination to succeed late Senator Lindsey Graham.

After Graham's sudden death in July, his sister, Darline Graham, was appointed to serve out the remainder of his term. However, Republicans needed a new candidate on the ballot due to Lindsey Graham's re-election bid and gaining the nomination earlier that June. Both Darline Graham, 62, and Rep. Ralph Norman, 54, have backgrounds in public service.

Graham previously served as commissioner of the South Carolina Commission for the Blind, while Norman represented South Carolina in the House since 2017. Other candidates in the race include Rep. Russell Fry, former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, and businessman Mark Lynch. The runoff will determine the final nominee for the November election against Democrat Annie Andrews, where Republicans are expected to maintain a strong lead.

Lindsey Graham won his last reelection with 54% in 2020, while former President Trump received 58% in 2024.

Written by urgent.news from CBS News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 7 other outlets

Read the original at cbsnews.com →

More in World

A case in which an uncle who had been sexually harassing his niece was beaten up by her and her boyfriend, with the niece brandishing a weapon, has been ruled by the Supreme Court to be a 'justifiable act' - one that did not break the law. The incident occurred in 2017. The victim, Ms A, who was in her 20s at the time, had been sexually harassed by her uncle, Mr B, on multiple occasions over several years. On July 2, 2017, Ms A and her boyfriend, Mr C, confronted Mr B at his home in Seoul. During the argument, Mr B made a threatening remark, saying, “You will be the one who ends up dead.” In response, Mr C physically assaulted Mr B, and Ms A brought out a weapon - a 19cm kitchen knife - from her bag and threatened him. As a result, Mr B suffered a fractured nose and required 14 weeks of medical treatment. The two were indicted for assault and battery and for carrying a deadly weapon. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the actions of Ms A and Mr C constituted a 'justifiable act' under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, which provides that an act that is conducted in accordance with social norms and is deemed reasonable under the circumstances is not a crime. The Supreme Court emphasized that it is necessary to consider the context and circumstances of the case when determining whether an act is justifiable. The court also noted that the lower courts had failed to fully consider the background and circumstances of the case, and that they had made an error in their interpretation of the law. The Supreme Court's decision was made on Thursday.

More from Wednesday 12 August →