Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Famous oddball quasar isn't X-ray weak after all, astronomers say

For more than two decades, the quasar PHL 1811 has been considered the prototype of a rare class of "intrinsically X-ray weak" quasars, thought to produce unusually little X-ray radiation. But in 2024, the Einstein Probe spacecraft caught the object in a bright X-ray flare. In a new study, astronomers combined that observation with more than 20 years of archival data to revisit the mystery. The…

Famous oddball quasar isn't X-ray weak after all, astronomers say

For over two decades, the quasar PHL 1811 has been viewed as the prototypical example of an intrinsically X-ray weak quasar. Astronomers assumed it produced significantly less X-ray radiation than expected due to a fast-feeding black hole. However, in 2024, the Einstein Probe spacecraft observed PHL 1811 in a bright X-ray flare — the first time it was seen in a normal, unobscured state in over two decades.

A new study led by Bin Luo of Nanjing University combined this 2024 observation with more than 20 years of archival data to reassess the quasar's X-ray behavior. The researchers analyzed every X-ray observation of PHL 1811 from 2001 to 2024, alongside matching ultraviolet measurements. Before 2024, PHL 1811 was exceptionally faint in X-rays and displayed highly variable X-ray output, sometimes fluctuating by a factor of three within days.

In August 2024, the quasar suddenly brightened to normal levels, only to fade again within days. This dramatic change in the quasar's X-ray behavior, while its optical and infrared brightness remained stable, suggests that the variability is caused by heavy, clumpy gas clouds obscuring the X-rays, rather than an intrinsic weakness in the quasar's X-ray-emitting corona.

The team concludes that their findings strongly support the heavy obscuration scenario over the idea that PHL 1811 is intrinsically weak in X-rays.

Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at phys.org →

More in Tech

More from Wednesday 12 August →