Did the Sewing Machine Reduce the Workload for Women?
Is new technology that replaces a worker a good thing? We have a tendency, it seems to me, to believe that most previous inventions turned out to have overall net social benefits, but to be worried that all future inventions will instead have overall net social costs. Philipp Ager and Davide Coluccia tackle the question of … Continue reading Did the Sewing Machine Reduce the Workload for Women?…
The advent of the sewing machine in the latter half of the 19th century sparked debate over whether it would benefit or harm women, according to a recent study by Philipp Ager and Davide Coluccia. While the innovation was hailed by some as a boon for women, the researchers reveal the effects varied significantly based on socioeconomic status.
Initially, the sewing machine was a luxury available only to industries. It wasn't until 1860 that entrepreneur Isaac Singer made the machine affordable for households, leading to widespread adoption. By the 1870s, nearly half of all US households owned a sewing machine. This shift transformed work patterns for women, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds.
Ager and Coluccia's research, utilizing detailed US census data from Massachusetts, showed that the sewing machine boosted employment for working-class women in industries like garment and shoe production. However, for middle-class women, the technology spurred earlier marriage and childbirth. The findings suggest the sewing machine's impact was nuanced, reflecting broader class and gender dynamics of the era.
While the machine did not necessarily free women from work, it did reshape their roles and opportunities in society.
Written by urgent.news from Conversable Economist's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
