Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Attackers pick Levi's pockets in social engineering attack

Crims talked their way onto three employee PCs before trousering corporate data

Attackers pick Levi's pockets in social engineering attack

Levi Strauss is investigating a data breach following an attack where social engineering was used to gain access to three employees' work computers. According to a regulatory filing, the intruders accessed and stole unspecified corporate information. Levi's discovered the intrusion, initiated its incident response protocols, enlisted outside cybersecurity professionals, and successfully severed the unauthorized access.

The company's preliminary investigation suggests that no customer data was compromised. Levi's also noted that the attack did not interrupt its operations and is unlikely to have a significant impact on its business. The affected individuals and regulators will be informed as necessary. Although Levi's is not disclosing further details about the incident, Reuters indicates that the company was among over 200 targeted over the past five weeks by ransom-seeking hackers utilizing traditional social engineering methods.

Google researchers have been monitoring several groups involved in the broader campaign, which they believe may be part of an umbrella organization called UNC6671. These hackers have been impersonating colleagues or IT support staff over personal mobile phones, directing employees to fake login pages to steal credentials and multi-factor authentication codes.

While it has not been confirmed that UNC6671 was responsible for the successful Levi's intrusion, the denim manufacturer has contained the breach before the attackers could penetrate further.

Written by urgent.news from The Register Science's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at theregister.com →

More in Tech

I Compared 12 WHOIS APIs — Subdomain Center Won on 3 Metrics

cybersecurity, #api, #python, #sideprojects The benchmark that embarrassed my wallet I burned $47 in API credits in 14 minutes. Same domain. Twelve different WHOIS endpoints.

  • Subdomain.center API returned 11,847 subdomains for stripe.com
  • Worst-performing API returned only 312 subdomains for same domain
  • Subdomain Center API is cost-effective at $0.002 per call

How Should Scripting Work in a Low-Code Platform?

In the previous post about automation, I ended with a question: Once automation connects business actions, where should the complex logic live? The answer is scripts. Scripting is easily misunderstood in a low-code platform. Some people ask why a low-code product needs scripts at all.

  • Scripts provide controlled environment for complex logic beyond configuration.
  • Client-side scripts manage interface behavior, calculations, and lightweight logic.

More from Monday 10 August →