Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Health & Medicine

As regulators crack the whip, firms return to drawing board

Over the past few years, public health experts, parliamentary committees and the Economic Survey have all argued for stronger front-of-pack information to help consumers make informed food choices. In Feb this year, Supreme Court also recommended the use of front-of-pack warning labels on packaged foods high in sugar, salt or saturated fat (HFSS), observing that such warnings should appear…

As regulators crack the whip, firms return to drawing board

As regulatory bodies intensify their oversight, consumer goods firms are revisiting their strategies. Products like Atta, paneer, tea, juices, biscuits, ghee, honey, chocolates, energy drinks, and whisky are under closer scrutiny. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is leading the charge against misleading product claims and labels, prompting companies to reassess their packaging, marketing messages, and even legal actions.

While some firms, like Dabur and Diageo, have contested the regulator's actions, the pressure mounts as the enforcement of existing standards accelerates. Former FSSAI CEO Pawan Agarwal notes that regulatory implementation, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to a significant shift. Consumers are now more diligent in reading labels, influenced by social media and expert analysis.

This scrutiny can lead to disrupted sales, altered packaging, delayed launches, and potential reputational harm. Companies face not only regulatory challenges but also a risk of losing consumer trust. The issue at hand revolves around the clarity and accuracy of on-pack labels, which may be misleading to consumers. Energy drinks, despite meeting caffeine limits, are under increased scrutiny regarding their suitability for certain demographics.

Firms are being urged to simplify and clarify their product information, aligning with the evolving regulatory environment. The liquor industry, however, argues that their products, sold under FSSAI and state licences, should not face changes unless clear directives are provided. The food industry's immediate challenge is to adapt labels, claims, and marketing while maintaining transparency and factual basis.

Meanwhile, the broader debate continues on the need for clearer nutrient thresholds for high-sugar, high-salt, and high-saturated fat foods.

Written by urgent.news from ETHealthworld's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at health.economictimes.indiatimes.com →

More in Health & Medicine

Triple-dose regimen may permanently clear HIV in infected newborns

Every year, more than 120,000 newborns worldwide contract HIV, creating a global health burden that requires lifelong treatment for millions of people—assuming they have access and can afford it. New research led by Oregon Health & Science University suggests another possibility: a one-time regimen of therapies given to newborns within…

Who really needs testosterone?

The military plans to start screening service members for low testosterone, and social media is overflowing with claims about testosterone therapy. But who actually needs it?

More from Monday 10 August →