A lot of casual friends, or only a few you’re really close with? New research questions that trade-off
Friendships are integral to human health and well being, yet researchers know very little about how people make friends. A new study investigated what people prioritize for new friendships.
A new study published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior suggests that people may not have to choose between having many friends or being emotionally close with them. The research, which involved over 5,000 international participants across five studies, indicates that individuals often want both wide networks of friends and intimate connections with them.
Rather than prioritizing one over the other, participants tended to hold both preferences simultaneously, seeking a balance between quantity and quality in their friendships. This finding challenges the notion that people must make a simple trade-off between the number of friends they have and the depth of their emotional relationships.
The study's authors suggest that the desire for intimacy with friends is not exclusive to a few close relationships, but rather a desire for emotional closeness that can manifest itself when individuals feel unsatisfied with their current social connections. Feeling lonely may trigger a greater emphasis on emotional closeness, prompting people to seek out new friendships and opportunities for deeper connections.
While the study did not directly measure the actual levels of emotional intimacy people experienced, it highlights the importance of friendships in human health and well-being. Further research could explore the differences in friendship-making preferences between men and women, as well as the potential implications for various social groups, such as college students or working professionals.
Additionally, the study raises questions about how other personality traits might influence friendship dynamics and whether extroversion truly drives the quantity and closeness of one's friendships.
Written by urgent.news from The Conversation's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

