Supreme Court settles conflicting rulings on inheritance rights
ISLAMABAD: Resolving conflicting jurisprudence on inheritance rights, the Supreme Court has affirmed that an inheritance-share suit becomes time-barred only if the defendant proves that the claimant knew or should reasonably have known about the denial of an heir’s share more than six years before filing the claim. Likewise, if the heir is instead trying to cancel a document he himself was party…
At the Supreme Court, President Donald Trump is pushing to diminish the influence of judges even further. The administration has filed an appeal seeking to restrict judges' ability to halt federal agencies' actions and regulations entirely. Currently, courts can issue nationwide injunctions that block agencies' rules from applying to all, not just the plaintiffs in a lawsuit.
Trump's legal team argues that such broad relief should be limited to the plaintiffs alone. If the court rules in Trump's favor, it could enable the executive branch to enforce rules broadly, even when judges have deemed them unlawful.
Written by urgent.news from New Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
