Does one person acting alone have the capacity to defraud a nation?
It is a travesty of justice to suggest that it was possible to conduct a grand-scale national scam without active accomplices across different communities.
Lord Denning, a revered figure in the realm of judicial decisions, championed the use of common sense in his rulings, drawing both from his own worldly experience and his roots in Tamil Nadu, India. In his jurisprudence, he firmly believed that the law should not be an abstract puzzle or a rigid trap for ordinary citizens, but rather a practical application of common sense to achieve true justice.
This approach was exemplified in his judgment in Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp (England) Ltd, where he stressed the importance of considering the full context of documents to discern what a reasonable businessperson would understand.
When it comes to the SRC International case, Denning's own words remind us that Najib Razak was denied procedural fairness and his constitutional right to legal counsel. It is crucial to recognize that procedural fairness is a fundamental pillar of our criminal justice system and constitutional framework. In light of this, it is an injustice to suggest that a single Malay individual could have masterminded a large-scale national fraud without the assistance of non-Malay enablers and professionals.
The notion that one person could possess the singular ability to carry out such a massive deception without the involvement of accomplices across various communities is an affront to the principles of justice. Ultimately, these opinions are the personal perspective of the author and do not necessarily represent the stance of FMT.
Written by urgent.news from Free Malaysia Today's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.