Book Review: MJ Akbar Explores Astrology, Power And Superstition In The Mughal Empire In 'After Me, Chaos'
In After Me, Chaos: Astrology in the Mughal Empire , veteran journalist, author, MJ Akbar ventures into an intriguing yet relatively underexplored facet of Mughal historiography: the pervasive influence of astrology, planetary configurations and celestial prognostications on the personal convictions and political choices of India's Mughal sovereigns. He delves into the personal belief systems,…
In MJ Akbar's book "After Me, Chaos: Astrology in the Mughal Empire," the author explores the role of astrology in shaping the personal beliefs and political decisions of Mughal emperors. The book delves into the astrological influences on the lives of India's Mughal rulers, from the birth of Akbar the Great and the horoscope drawn by his father's astrologer Maulana Chand, to the reign of Aurangzeb and his decision to ascend the throne on an auspicious day.
Akbar's meticulous research is evident throughout the book, as he meticulously describes the celestial configurations and astrological implications of the birth charts of the emperors. He also discusses the astrological beliefs and practices of Mughal emperors such as Genghis Khan, Taimur, and Aurangzeb, as well as the influence of astrologers on the royal households.
The book moves beyond astrological beliefs to provide insights into the personal habits, eccentricities, and political strategies of the Mughal emperors. For example, the chapter on Jahangir delves into the emperor's indulgences and power dynamics, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the private and political lives of the Mughal elite.
Akbar's exploration of Mughal India as a confluence of diverse cultural and epistemological traditions adds intellectual significance to the book. By examining the syncretism between religious orthodoxy and celestial preoccupation, the author reveals the complex interplay of various influences on the Mughal court.
Written by urgent.news from Free Press Journal's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
