People like their jobs, even British people
This paper investigates the role of work in providing meaning, purpose, community, and other non-monetary benefits. Using an original cross-national survey of 8,234 working-age adults across the UK, US, Denmark, and India, I study the factors that motivate people in their work, with an eye toward the future AI economic transformation. I find that 81% […] The post People like their jobs, even…
A new study explores the role of work in providing meaning, purpose, and community, examining factors that motivate individuals in their jobs. The survey of 8,234 working-age adults from the UK, US, Denmark, and India reveals that 81% of respondents are satisfied with their employment, and a majority are strongly driven by non-monetary aspects of their work.
According to the "Work Values" Index, one-third of workers are intrinsically motivated by their job, finding value in their role itself. Nearly a quarter are motivated by social and community aspects, 17% by social status, and 24% by the financial benefits of their job. While most people would leave their job for the same salary guaranteed as income, one-fifth would stay even if offered up to 120% of their current salary.
Intrinsically motivated workers were more likely to refuse a basic income substitution, and those attached to their job for non-monetary reasons were more likely to engage in volunteering or work-like activities if they no longer could perform their role. The findings suggest that non-monetary work motivations are evenly distributed across income levels and between white- and blue-collar workers.
These insights have implications for managing the AI transition, understanding attitudes to AI, and comprehending policy preferences. Guaranteeing a basic income may be necessary to address AI labor shocks, but it may not fully compensate workers for the loss of non-monetary benefits derived from their jobs.
Written by urgent.news from Marginal Revolution's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.