Legal experts divided over A-GC's decision to defer Najib's house arrest [WATCH]
KUALA LUMPUR: The decision by the Attorney-General’s Chambers (A-GC) to defer the implementation of Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s house arrest has drawn criticism over its timing.
![Legal experts divided over A-GC's decision to defer Najib's house arrest [WATCH]](/img/19041287)
The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has postponed the enforcement of Datuk Seri Najib Razak's house arrest, sparking debate among legal experts. Professor Dr Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik Mahmood, a constitutional and legal expert, pointed out that the decision should be considered in the context of legal concerns surrounding the Order of Discharge issued by the Kuala Lumpur High Court.
The issue, he explained, revolves around the use of the word "discharged," which raises doubts about whether Najib's prison sentence remains active or has been finalized after the fine payment. While the A-GC's press statement does not dispute the pardon decision itself, Professor Nik Ahmad Kamal believes that the word "discharged" triggered the A-GC to issue the order, as it could lead to interpretation confusion and potentially detrimental consequences for the nation.
The expert acknowledged that the decision drew criticism, but he emphasized that the A-G, as the government's legal advisor, needed to assess the potential implications of such interpretations before taking any action.
Written by urgent.news from New Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
