KKIA decision must be based on evidence, says logistics group

Daniel Doughty, chairman of the Sabah logistics and transport institute, emphasized the necessity of a thorough evaluation when considering whether to keep or relocate Kota Kinabalu International Airport (KKIA). The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport Malaysia's Sabah chairman stated that airport decisions should be grounded in factual evidence and balanced assessments, rather than preconceived notions.

Following a public forum on KKIA's future, Doughty underscored his institute's role: to supply information to enable informed decision-making, not to dictate public opinion. To evaluate KKIA's future, Doughty advocated for a comprehensive examination of factors such as development expenses, financial requirements, environmental repercussions, and long-term economic consequences.

During the forum, aviation consultant Edward Clayton and ex-civil aviation regulator Chester Voo shared their insights into KKIA's potential trajectory. Doughty stressed that merely enlarging the airport's facilities would not inevitably attract more airlines or establish a thriving aviation hub. He pointed out that passenger demand, airline profitability, and ancillary industries play equally crucial roles.

The logistics institute welcomed the state government's intention to initiate an integrated transport and logistics master plan study in 2027, which would encompass air, land, and maritime connectivity. The institute emphasized that airport development should be evaluated within the broader context of a transport and logistics strategy, ensuring infrastructure investments yield tangible economic advantages.