Three reasonable doubts and a capital sin behind the collapse of the railway network
The common thread of much of the debate is the loss of prominence of the user, converted into a passive subject subject to other needs, often political ones.
Many experts claim they had well-founded warnings about the flaws in the railway system that led to accidents such as those in Urda and Adamuz. The liberalization of high-speed rail, the generational gap among staff at Renfe and Adif, and the investment deficit had been flagged as concerns. Despite these warnings, a combination of factors likely contributed to a recent severe incident. The issue has sparked a call for in-depth reflection on how to rebuild trust in a devastated transportation system.
Written by urgent.news from El Pais Economia's report — not a translation of it. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
