The U.S. Has $50 Billion for Nuclear Waste and Nowhere to Put It
Finland and the United States are exemplifying two opposing approaches to managing the mounting problem of spent nuclear fuel. Finland is about to open the world’s first permanent nuclear waste disposal facility. The United States is stuck in a cycle of endless political turnover and resultant gridlock about how to address the more than 90,000 metric tons of spent fuel sitting in temporary…
Finland is preparing to open the world's first permanent nuclear waste disposal facility, while the United States grapples with a lack of permanent storage for its spent nuclear fuel, posing a growing public health risk and financial burden. Finland's Onkalo site, which will store nuclear waste 400 meters under the ground for 100,000 years, has obtained its operating license after 22 years of construction.
In contrast, the U.S. has only one official nuclear fuel repository site, Nevada's Yucca Mountain, which has not received funding for over a decade. Additionally, the U.S. has approximately 97,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel stored at 75 sites across 30 states, without the consent of local communities. Federal attempts to address this issue have been hampered by political turnover, with the country's nuclear waste fund holding over $50 billion in reserve.
However, the approval of such funds requires bipartisan support in Congress, which is often elusive. This political instability makes long-term nuclear waste management projects extremely challenging and costly to sustain.
Written by urgent.news from OilPrice's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
