Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Is Mandating AI Use in the Workplace Backfiring?

Some workplaces are holding mandatory AI training sessions, while others "are requiring employees to use a specific number of tokens," reports the Washington Post, "or log a certain amount of time on AI platforms." The article's headline? "Why mandating AI use in the workplace can backfire." [A] lot of employers are going about it the wrong way, said Arvind Karunakaran, an assistant professor of…

Some companies are mandating the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace, while others are requiring employees to generate a certain number of tokens or spend a specific amount of time interacting with AI platforms. This approach, according to Arvind Karunakaran, an assistant professor at Stanford University, may not yield the desired outcomes.

Many employers are making common mistakes when implementing AI usage policies, according to Karunakaran. He explains that consuming a large number of tokens does not necessarily result in creating substantial value. Additionally, the rapid adoption of AI tools is outpacing the pace at which organizations are prepared. While AI has been found to enhance productivity and innovation, one-third of surveyed organizations anticipate AI-related layoffs in the near future.

Mandating AI use without considering employee benefits can lead to disengagement and a feeling of being undervalued. Karunakaran's research indicates that in the short term, mandating AI tools may boost productivity. However, in the long-term, employees may perceive their contributions as insignificant. To encourage positive engagement with AI, Karunakaran recommends providing employees with opportunities to explore and share their experiences and success stories.

Many workplaces still fail to involve their employees in the decision-making process regarding AI adoption. According to a Gallup and Jobs for the Future report, more than half of the employees feel they have less influence than they desire on introducing new technologies in the workplace.

Written by urgent.news from Slashdot's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at it.slashdot.org →

More in AI

在同一份 Note 裡,osFoundry 如何避免 Claude 的編輯蓋掉別人的編輯?

這是 Claude 對話在 osFoundry Notes 上可以用的寫入工具,內容取自公開 MCP endpoint 的列表。資料是 2026-11-06 用未驗證的 tools/list 抓下來的,只保留跟本文有關的欄位: { "name" : "edit_note_tab" , "description" : "Use an exact tab ID and version from…

  • osFoundry's Note tab prevents Claude's edits from overwriting others.
  • Required fields: noteid, tabid, expectedversion, idempotencykey.
  • Operation type determines action: replacetext, replacetabdata, etc.

I Spent 8 PRs Fixing My AI Fact-Checker. Then I Deleted All 12,852 Lines.

I asked AI to check AI. It cost more, caught nothing, and broke good articles. I run a few product sites where AI writes the articles. Power stations, gear, that kind of thing.

  • Author spent 8 PRs refining AI fact-checker, but it failed
  • Fact-checker blocked good articles with false alarms
  • Author deleted checker, removed 12,852 lines of code

More from Saturday 7 November →