Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Choosing a Tech ETF: Low Fees vs. Targeted Exposure

FTEC's lower 0.08% expense ratio and broader 294-holding portfolio delivered stronger 12-month performance, while IYW offers a more concentrated bet on semiconductors, software, and hardware.

When deciding between the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and the iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW), investors must weigh the advantages of low costs versus targeted exposure within the U.S. tech sector. Both funds seek to replicate their respective indexes, offering broad exposure to U.S.-listed technology companies. However, their underlying indexes result in distinct holding counts and cost structures that could impact long-term performance for investors employing a buy-and-hold strategy.

FTEC boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to IYW's 0.37%, translating to significant fee savings for investors. For instance, purchasing $10,000 worth of each fund would incur $8 in annual expenses for FTEC versus $37 for IYW. Additionally, FTEC provides a higher dividend yield of 0.30 percentage points over IYW's yield, further enhancing its appeal for income-focused investors.

FTEC's portfolio encompasses approximately 300 stocks, with substantial allocations to Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft, representing 17.73%, 16.95%, and 12.22% of its holdings respectively. In contrast, IYW maintains a smaller selection of 148 positions, with a stronger emphasis on semiconductors, software, and hardware, investing heavily in Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft as well.

Both funds have demonstrated comparable historical performance over the past five years, delivering total returns of 103% for FTEC and 102% for IYW, corresponding to CAGRs of 15.2% and 15.1% respectively.

In summary, while both FTEC and IYW provide access to the technology sector, FTEC's lower costs and higher dividend yield may make it an attractive choice for cost-conscious investors seeking broad exposure to mid-cap and small-cap tech stocks. Meanwhile, IYW's narrower portfolio may appeal to investors who prefer a tighter selection of large-cap tech companies. Ultimately, the decision between these two ETFs will depend on an investor's specific priorities and investment goals within the tech sector.

Written by urgent.news from Motley Fool's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fool.com →

More in AI

SoundHound AI: 3 Key Takeaways for Long-Term Investors

Its shift from one-time license fees to recurring hosted subscriptions makes future revenue easier to forecast, a change worth weighing before the margin story.

  • SoundHound AI expects sustainable profitability in H2 2027
  • Company streamlines costs through recent acquisitions and duplicate function elimination
  • AI model migration reduces costs and provides competitive advantages

Warren Buffett Warned Investors About This Number 27 Years Ago. It's Never Been Higher. Should AI Investors Worry?

In 1999, Buffett said corporate profits couldn't stay much above 6% of the economy for long. They're now more than double that, and the AI spending boom is a big reason why.

  • Warren Buffett warned about corporate profits reaching 13% of GDP in 2026.
  • AI investors should worry as AI stocks may face slowdown pressure.
  • Berkshire Hathaway focuses on companies with durable competitive advantages.

More from Saturday 7 November →