A 'reverse-Ginsberg' scenario could flip the Supreme Court without packing
In Henry VI, Shakespeare wrote, "Defer no time, delays have dangerous ends." Many today would like to chisel those words above the doors to the Supreme Court. Time and time again, justices waited too long for their own legacies. For many conservatives, the decisive loss of both houses of Congress has created a true nightmare...
In Islamabad, a three-member Supreme Court bench led by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, alongside Justices Musarrat Hilali and Shahid Bilal Hassan, issued an eight-page judgment on Saturday restoring two civil revisions. These revisions had previously been dismissed for non-prosecution because the petitioner’s counsel was unable to appear due to a Coronavirus infection.
The court set aside a February 23, 2026, Lahore High Court decision that had rejected the restoration applications, converting the civil petitions into appeals.
Justice Mazhar observed that absolute vigilance by an advocate is a "foundational requirement" for protecting a client's case from dismissal. The judgment noted the legal maxim "Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt," implying that the law assists the vigilant rather than those who neglect their rights. Dawn reports that the court previously expressed regret last September when litigants and counsel treated the court's leniency as a procedural formality and disregarded categorical directives.
Brief written by urgent.news from The Hill, Dawn - Pakistan, Dawn — 3 reports on this story. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Supreme Court terms lawyers' vigilance 'foundational' to protecting clients' cases from dismissal dawn.com
- Supreme Court partially overturns conviction linked to anti-Soviet resistance news.err.ee
- Supreme Court says stopping vehicles, construction to prevent pollution ‘old, tried, failed tools’ thehindu.com