Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

Crypto exchanges tout cold storage ratios after Binance attack

Coinbase says it keeps more than 99% of customer assets offline, while Gate reports 88.26% of its total assets are kept in cold storage.

Crypto exchanges tout cold storage ratios after Binance attack

Following the recent Binance attack, crypto exchanges are emphasizing their cold storage ratios to reassure users. Coinbase claims to keep over 99% of customer assets offline, while Gate reports 88.26% of its total assets in cold storage. The incident has prompted exchanges to disclose their asset distribution between hot wallets and cold storage.

Gate recently introduced a "Proof of Security" (PoSEC) framework, stating that 88.26% of its assets are stored in cold storage and 11.74% in hot wallets. The framework aims to provide transparency into asset storage structures and their capability to cover potential losses in extreme scenarios. Gate's data is currently undergoing independent review by a third-party audit firm.

After the Binance incident, Coinbase and Upbit highlighted their high cold storage ratios. Coinbase states that more than 99% of customer assets are held in offline cold storage, while Upbit confirms a 99.17% cold wallet storage ratio as of September 2026. These figures already meet South Korea's regulatory minimum of 80%. Upbit's spokesperson explains that their strategy is to maintain hot wallet holdings below 1% of customer digital assets.

Other major South Korean exchanges, such as Bithumb, Coinone, Digital X, and GOPAX, have disclosed slightly lower cold wallet shares, ranging from 94.76% to 80.54%. OKX, on the other hand, reports over 95% of client crypto assets in cold wallets and less than 5% in hot wallets. However, these ratios may not be directly comparable due to different reporting periods and calculation methods.

While cold storage ratios offer some insight into an exchange's security, they do not account for potential vulnerabilities in offline wallets, such as compromised signing systems or fraudulent transactions by employees.

Written by urgent.news from Cointelegraph's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at cointelegraph.com →

More in Finance & Markets

More from Friday 6 November →