Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Voters' data center rebuke hits some tech companies harder than others

Anti-data center measures passed in the US midterms could carry financial consequences for tech giants.

Voters' data center rebuke hits some tech companies harder than others

Voters in Ohio's Piqua and Trenton, as well as Ashville, outside Columbus, recently rejected plans for large data centers or recalled commissioners who supported them. These ballot measures reflect a nationwide surge in anti-data-center sentiment, with dozens of measures proposing bans, moratoriums, or stricter regulations. Companies like Meta, Amazon, and EdgeConneX face financial consequences due to these votes, as some projects were already in progress.

Meta's $110 million investment in Piqua and Amazon's proposed 600-acre campus in Trenton have been directly impacted. Despite the bans, both companies stated they remain committed to Ohio and continue engaging with local communities. According to a Cleanview analysis, over 40% of US planned data center capacity is located in states with paused or banned new data centers.

While this may slow buildout, markets anticipate a slowdown. Shares of companies directly exposed to physical data center construction, like Modine and Sterling Infrastructure, declined 21% each. Meanwhile, hyperscaler stocks rose, as traders believe data center spending will be curbed. As Democrats prepare for a Congress with a mandate to address AI data centers, tech companies are recalibrating their strategies ahead of potential new regulations.

Written by urgent.news from Semafor's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at semafor.com →

More in Tech

How to Test Failover Without Taking Production Down: Game Days, Chaos Experiments, and a Region-Failure Drill

Test failover safely by climbing a ladder from tabletop exercises and staging tests to small, reversible production experiments with a limited blast radius, explicit abort conditions, and a rollback…

  • Begin with tabletop exercises to validate runbooks and decision-making
  • Progress to staging tests with production-like data volumes
  • Conduct full region evacuation drills as final step in testing ladder

Cheapest per token is not cheapest per finished job: what 2,400 runs show

A model with a 33% pass rate turned out to be the cheapest way to finish a task in a recent 10-model benchmark. The same benchmark shows why that result is less of a free lunch than it looks.

  • Cheapest model gpt-oss-120b 12 times cheaper per finished task than GPT-5.5
  • Coverage crucial factor: gpt-oss-120b solved 8/40 tasks, GPT-5.5 solved 25/40
  • Price tier not always predicts success: GPT-5.5 69% pass rate on easy tasks

More from Thursday 5 November →