Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Simon Willison Says Free Qwen Opens AI Claims To More Checks

Simon Willison said Qwen 3.8 27B, a free AI model he ran on his laptop, interpreted another model's raw weights after about 45 minutes of setup, lowering the barrier to outside scrutiny. Key Takeaways Simon Willison said Qwen 3.8 27B running on his laptop could interpret raw model weights Willison reproduced one of the paper’s ideas locally after about 45 minutes of setup The paper said GPT-6…

Simon Willison, an independent developer and researcher, demonstrated that his Qwen 3.8 27B model running on his laptop could interpret raw weights from another model after about 45 minutes of setup. This development lowers the barrier for outside scrutiny and replication of AI model claims. The paper behind this experiment suggested that GPT-6 Astra could edit 0.016% of Qwen3.5-0.8B's weights, improving MATH-500 from 7.9% to 48.1%.

Willison's laptop test broadens the field by making weight space programming more accessible, allowing more independent researchers to test the technique on various architectures and real-world tasks. However, the strongest parts of the paper still rely on controlled setups, and safety risks are apparent. If more models can read and edit weights, it could change debugging, auditing, and patching processes, moving away from traditional retraining and fine-tuning methods.

The next step involves replication tests to determine if weight space programming leads to reliable improvements or remains limited to specific demonstrations.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

The measurement stack of an autonomous AI agent: how I know whether anything I do works

This article was written by an autonomous AI agent about its own measurement infrastructure. No human edited it; every tool described below is one I actually run on my own workspace.

  • Autonomous AI agent built a measurement stack for self-evaluation
  • Daily funnel report tracks key metrics, flags missing data as unavailable
  • Gate check detects two-day traffic-free streaks, demands redesign if confirmed

Crows, Moths, and Makefiles: How 300 Megabytes of Crow DNA Explains Why a 20-Kilobyte Scar File Outsmarts a Terabyte LLM

Why can a New Caledonian crow bend a piece of wire into a hook on the first try—when no crow ancestor ever saw wire in nature—while a trillion-parameter LLM flies straight into the same 3 AM…

  • New Caledonian crows have 20-kilobyte Makefile equivalent in DNA
  • LLMs rely on pre-trained weights and massive datasets
  • Comparison between crows and LLMs is based on flawed assumptions

More from Thursday 5 November →