Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

Republicans made Hasan Piker their midterm villain. Now he’s suing Scott Jennings for $72.5 million

The Twitch streamer is seeking $72.5 million from CNN’s Scott Jennings over a spliced clip. His lawyer says Ted Cruz and others should “buckle up.”

Republicans made Hasan Piker their midterm villain. Now he’s suing Scott Jennings for $72.5 million

Republican Party favored Hasan Piker as the primary antagonist during the 2026 midterm season. His image prominently appeared in attack ads, including Michigan's Senate race and at the Republican National Committee's convention. President Trump even labeled him as "a terrible liability for Democrats." However, Democrats took control of Congress, flipping multiple Senate seats, including in Kansas, South Carolina, and Texas.

Candidates closely associated with Piker, like Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed, managed to win despite GOP attempts to link him with Piker. Piker's 13-hour election-night stream garnered a viewership of over 200,000 and logged 1.75 million hours, placing him second only to NBC News among election-night livestreams on Twitch.

The streaming platform, owned by Amazon, ranked No. 1 on the 2026 Fortune 500 list. Simultaneously, Piker is preparing for a significant legal battle worth $72.5 million against Scott Jennings, a conservative commentator and CNN contributor. Jennings accused Piker of advocating for lynchings on his show, The Scott Jennings Show, which aired a 42-second montage from one of Piker's Twitch broadcasts.

This statement came after a legal demand from Piker's attorney, Daniel Watkins, who had asked Jennings to retract the false claim, which Jennings did not do. The lawsuit alleges that Jennings' claims were false or recklessly disregarded the truth, and as a public figure, Piker needs to prove actual malice. The case is particularly significant for Piker as he views it as vindication, given the Republican Party's attempts to portray him as a central boogeyman during the midterms, which ultimately backfired on their candidates.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in Finance & Markets

Where merger arbitrage meets convertibles

Paul Glazer explains how cross-team synergy, a loosening regulatory backdrop and larger $10bn-plus deals are fuelling conviction-led arbitrage.

  • Glazer Capital focuses on merger arbitrage, SPAC arbitrage, and convertible arbitrage
  • Convertible arbitrage has a 3-5 year horizon, unlike merger arbitrage with a discernible conclusion
  • US regulatory environment supports $4tn M&A deal value growth, with 95% of deals completing

More from Thursday 5 November →