Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Keyword Research in Python: Ideas, Search Volume, Difficulty and Intent for ~$3 per 1,000 Keywords

Most keyword research comes down to one loop: start from a few seed terms, expand them into everything people actually search, then keep the ones with real volume and a difficulty you can win. Here's how to run that loop from code, paying per keyword instead of per month, plus what a real run returns and where the data falls short. Three ways to expand seeds Disclosure: we (SteadyScrape) built…

Keyword research in Python involves starting with a few seed terms, expanding them into real search terms people use, and then keeping the ones with enough search volume and manageable difficulty. The Python-based Keyword Research Tool by SteadyScrape automates this process, allowing users to run the expansion loop from code at a cost of $3 per 1,000 keywords.

The tool provides various data points for each keyword, including monthly search volume, cost-per-click (CPC), keyword difficulty (KD), search intent, SERP features, and trend percentages. Users can filter results based on volume, difficulty, intent, or exclude specific words. The tool uses a licensed keyword database refreshed monthly and operates only on Google search data, not YouTube, Amazon, or Bing.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

SilentMind: AI that censors and generates controversy in searches

SilentMind: the censor model that is booming in searches and generating controversy Introduction On October 15, 2024, Tencent launched SilentMind, an AI model that automatically blocks sensitive and…

  • SilentMind AI filters sensitive, political content in searches
  • Model launched Oct 15, 2024, boosts 420% searches for "SilentMind censorship"
  • Three-layer filtering system replaces blocked answers with generic messages

Cheapest per token is not cheapest per finished job: what 2,400 runs show

A model with a 33% pass rate turned out to be the cheapest way to finish a task in a recent 10-model benchmark. The same benchmark shows why that result is less of a free lunch than it looks.

  • Cheapest model gpt-oss-120b 12 times cheaper per finished task than GPT-5.5
  • Coverage crucial factor: gpt-oss-120b solved 8/40 tasks, GPT-5.5 solved 25/40
  • Price tier not always predicts success: GPT-5.5 69% pass rate on easy tasks

How to Test Failover Without Taking Production Down: Game Days, Chaos Experiments, and a Region-Failure Drill

Test failover safely by climbing a ladder from tabletop exercises and staging tests to small, reversible production experiments with a limited blast radius, explicit abort conditions, and a rollback…

  • Begin with tabletop exercises to validate runbooks and decision-making
  • Progress to staging tests with production-like data volumes
  • Conduct full region evacuation drills as final step in testing ladder

More from Thursday 5 November →