Democrats' big win clouds the permitting picture
Democrats' blowout win further complicates the fraught path to passing a permitting deal in the lame duck. Why it matters: Cutting hurdles for projects is a top priority for fossil fuels and renewables sectors. But critics argue the Senate plan unacceptably weakens environmental protections and tribal input. The big picture: Dems' looming control of Congress "worsens the outlook" for the bill…
Democrats' decisive victory in recent elections has complicated efforts to pass a permitting deal before the end of the current session. Cutting red tape for both fossil fuel and renewable energy projects is a top priority for both sectors, but critics argue that the Senate's plan significantly weakens environmental safeguards and tribal participation. According to advisory firm Capstone, Democrats' imminent control of Congress makes it more likely the bill will be delayed until 2027.
President Trump is expected to pressure House Republicans to support the package, but with his diminished standing after the midterms, his political influence may be limited. In a statement, Senate Democrats emphasized that the time to act remains, comparing the bill to "a bird in the hand" and noting that failing to take it could be seen as foolish. The bipartisan bill's co-authors argue that now is the opportune moment, as the proposal reduces energy costs for families and enables progress on campaign promises.
While the odds of the bill securing support in the lame duck session have decreased from 30% to 20%-25% according to Rapidan Energy Group, the firm remains optimistic about a deal with Trump in 2027-2028. This perspective challenges many supporters who view the current window as brief. Rapidan's reasoning is based on Trump's first-term agreements with Democrats on issues such as the debt limit and government funding, often against the wishes of GOP leaders.
Democrats would only need five or six Republican votes to reach the 60-vote threshold, and Trump's precedent could potentially encourage him to negotiate with Democrats to reduce veto risks.
Experts from TD Cowen have reduced their assessment of a lame duck passage from 40% to 25%, and ClearView Energy Partners also contends that Democrats' win in both chambers could weaken the bill's prospects. Jason Grumet, head of the American Clean Power Association, stated that the bill reflects voters' desire for cheaper energy and believes that Congress sees this as a unique opportunity.
If action is not taken within the next three to four weeks, a bipartisan effort in the coming years may be unlikely. On the opposing side, Rep. Jared Huffman, who will likely lead the Natural Resources Committee, argues that Democrats should demonstrate that the days of Trump's "supplicant Senate" are gone, insisting on hearings and amendments to the bill, which he currently opposes.
The White House is still pushing for action in the lame duck session but has not explicitly stated whether it would be open to negotiating an altered bill next year. The White House supports the bipartisan deal reached between Republicans and Democrats and acknowledges that the time to implement permitting reform is now.
Written by urgent.news from Axios's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.