AI might be the final boss for your best ideas
Earlier this year, I was staring at our 2026 plan and thinking: there are too many things in here. Payroll, billing, cross-border payments, payment licences, more salespeople, more product development. Individually, almost every initiative had a reasonable argument behind it. The problem was that they couldn’t all be equally important. So I uploaded the numbers, […] The post AI might be the final…
In 2026, the author found themselves overwhelmed by their 2026 plan, filled with initiatives such as payroll, billing, and sales expansion. To tackle this, they utilized AI to question their strategy and uncover its weaknesses. Initially, AI helped with tasks like researching regulatory changes and summarizing lengthy documents, but the author soon realized its true value lay in its ability to provoke disagreement and challenge assumptions.
In many organizations, there exists a cultural barrier to straightforward disagreement, especially among senior leaders. Due to their status, ideas tend to be protected rather than challenged, leading to a lack of constructive criticism. This is where AI emerged as a useful tool, allowing the author to present their ideas for attack without fear of hierarchy or consequences. By constantly questioning their strategy's assumptions and seeking areas of weakness, the author discovered a more robust approach to decision-making.
However, AI can also introduce its own flawed assumptions, which can result in incorrect conclusions. Therefore, the author emphasizes the importance of separating AI-generated arguments from factual data. The author still relies on AI to identify weaknesses in their arguments but ultimately verifies the facts through original sources, such as regulations and financial information.
Ultimately, AI acts as the "final boss," a final test before finalizing a strategy. It pushes the author to confront their own assumptions and critically evaluate their ideas. While AI may not provide definitive answers, it helps the author earn their own conclusions by engaging them in a more insightful and thorough discussion. The process encourages open questioning, revealing the weakest assumptions and offering a deeper understanding of the chosen strategy.
Written by urgent.news from e27's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.