Australia’s social media ban faces high court challenge

Almost a year after Australia introduced its controversial social media ban, critics argue that the legislation has been ineffective in preventing children from accessing popular platforms like Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and others. Teenage activist Noah Jones, who was 15 when the ban took effect, is now leading a constitutional challenge at the nation's highest court, arguing that teenagers have a right to be part of the digital "town square."

The ban, which prohibits under-16s from accessing social media sites, was designed to limit political communication for minors. However, research by University of Newcastle professor Courtney Barnes and others has shown that 85% of under-16s continued to use prohibited platforms three months after the ban. The Australian government has promised to double fines for social media companies to AUS$99 million ($69 million) if breaches are identified and has introduced new powers for the eSafety commissioner to compel companies to provide information about their efforts to keep children off their sites.

Despite this, no fines have been issued so far. Critics, including age verification provider Iain Corby, argue that the ban has been a missed opportunity for evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of age restrictions, as platforms have not implemented the law in good faith.