Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Security Headers List: 6 Headers Every Site Needs in 2026

Originally published on Sitecheckly . A robust security headers list includes Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy. These HTTP response headers protect against cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and unwanted data leaks. Implementing them requires adding simple response directives…

The article highlights the importance of implementing security headers on websites in 2026 to protect against various web vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and data leaks. The six essential security headers recommended for production websites are Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), Content-Security-Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy.

These headers act as a defense layer within the client browser, reducing the attack surface without altering application code. Missing security headers can expose users to common web vulnerabilities, and despite their importance, 84% of the 97 sites audited on Sitecheckly in the last 90 days were found to be missing these headers.

Brief written by urgent.news from Dev.to's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

FHIR Validation Doesn't Tell You What to Do Next, So I Built a Decision Layer

A FHIR resource can pass validation and still be the wrong thing to act on. I built a small decision layer for that gap: it takes parsed FHIR R4 resources, sends a flattened state to TypeSafe AI's Jev…

  • FHIR validation alone doesn't dictate next steps for a resource
  • Decision layer processes parsed FHIR R4 resources to determine action
  • Model achieves 0.814 to 0.922 accuracy on 204 synthetic records

A PKCS#11 key can be protected and still be over-authorized

A PKCS#11 key can be protected and still be over-authorized Moving a signing key into an HSM changes where the key material lives.

  • PKCS#11 keys can be protected yet over-authorized.
  • CKAALWAYSAUTHENTICATE requires PIN for every key usage.
  • Application, not HSM, determines key authorization for business transactions.

More from Sunday 1 November →