Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Before Buying Anthropic Stock, Here's What History Says About Investing in IPOs

Key PointsAfter releasing its S-1 filing on Oct. 26, Anthropic could become a publicly traded company in less than a month.

Investors contemplating Anthropic's upcoming IPO should consider the historical performance of other technology-focused companies that have gone public. Meta Platforms, for instance, saw a remarkable 1,572% increase in stock price from May 2012 to May 2026, despite initially dropping 47% from its IPO price of $38 in May 2012. However, Meta's journey was not without its dips, with five out of ten top IPOs by capital raised experiencing negative returns in the first three months after going public.

Looking at the broader picture of these top 10 IPOs, five companies in this group had negative returns in their first year of public trading. Another example is SpaceX, which went public in June with a share price of $150, but it skyrocketed to $225.64 within hours before falling to $104.83 in August. It stabilized later, closing at $143.89 on Oct. 29, below its IPO price.

The data suggests that investing solely in the IPO's initial performance can be misleading. Instead, it is recommended to adopt a long-term perspective. For Anthropic, being a technology company places it in a favorable sector historically associated with higher returns. However, it's crucial to remember that the first day of trading can be volatile, and it may take time for the stock price to stabilize. Therefore, a thoughtful, long-term investment strategy may be the wisest approach for those considering Anthropic's IPO.

Written by urgent.news from Motley Fool's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at nasdaq.com →

More in AI

Collector's item: what AI doesn't produce

Dynamo published this week its Letter 130, The Tacit of Time. The text is not about clocks – it is about businesses that are sustained on trust, habit and tacit knowledge.

  • Dynamo's Letter 130 discusses trust-based businesses, habits, and tacit knowledge.
  • Manager recently started collecting luxury watches, finding market description challenging.
  • Watch collecting highlights importance of trust-based businesses over AI offerings.

An 89% Accurate Hiring AI Can Still Be Unfair. Here’s Why.

High accuracy is not the same as fair outcomes, and confusing the two is one of the costliest mistakes in AI. Picture this.

  • An AI hiring system can achieve 89% accuracy but still be unfair.
  • Accuracy and fairness are distinct metrics, not interchangeable.
  • Monitor bias in production and adjust models with fairness constraints.

More from Sunday 1 November →