Rajasthan directs official records to be updated after Kota govt. school instructor's gender transition
The instructor had requested permission to change his gender from female to male and his name under Rule 8A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1991, in accordance with the relevant government provisions
In Kota, Rajasthan, the government has officially acknowledged the gender transition of a physical training instructor at a local school. The instructor, a 27-year-old male who legally changed his name after undergoing gender surgery, will now be recognized under a different male name. The update to official records came after the Rajasthan government directed the State education department to amend documents in line with the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act and Rule 8A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1991.
The decision to implement the change regime was made following a petition filed against the NALSA judgment, which was deemed "grossly discriminatory" against "biological females." The India chapter of a UK-based trust aims to overrule this judgment, asserting that legal recognition of gender identity is a constitutional right to dignity and freedom.
The instructor, who requested anonymity due to privacy concerns, had previously sought permission to change his gender and name under the relevant government provisions. The Deputy Secretary of the Education Department in Jaipur provided a directive ensuring all legal and departmental protocols were met. The District Education Officer (Secondary), Kota, Ramcharan Meena, and Deputy Education Officer (Elementary), Roop Singh Meena, confirmed the issuance of the directive.
With official gazette notifications, newspaper announcements, and necessary legal bonds processed, the state government has now updated all service records to reflect the individual's new identity. All official correspondence, departmental duties, and institutional mandates concerning the physical training teacher will now address him under his new male name.
Written by urgent.news from The Hindu's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.