Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

If California undid its ‘original sin’ and matched Texas on taxing property, it would raise more revenue than the billionaire tax, economists say

If California undid its ‘original sin’ and matched Texas on taxing property, it would raise more revenue than the billionaire tax, economists say

Proposition 40, a billionaire wealth tax proposal, will be on California voters' ballots, but it's the 1978 Proposition 13 that lingers in the background. This measure capped property taxes at 1% of assessed value, limiting annual hikes to 2%, and required reassessments only after sales or major renovations. After its passage, California turned to taxing incomes, including capital gains, to make up for lost revenue.

The state now boasts the most progressive income tax structure in the nation, with a top rate of 13.3%. This can push total tax to over 50% when combined with federal rates. The top 1% of earners contribute up to half of California's revenue, but the wealth tax could potentially raise $100 billion, according to supporters. Princeton economist Owen Zidar and University of Chicago Booth School of Business economist Eric Zwick argue that Prop 13 is the "original sin" of California's tax system, calling for its elimination as a more efficient and sustainable way to tax the rich.

Matching Texas' residential property tax rate of 2% would more than double California's residential property tax revenue, while also reducing home prices by around 13%. However, repealing Prop 13 would likely result in significant increases in property taxes for homeowners, and the state's already narrow tax base might not be able to support such a shift in taxation.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in Finance & Markets

Better iShares Emerging Markets ETF: IEMG vs. EEM

IEMG charges just 0.09% annually versus EEM's 0.72%, and holds nearly 2,900 stocks for broader diversification. Both track similar sectors but deliver different risk-return profiles.

  • IEMG has lower expense ratio at 0.09% compared to EEM's 0.72%
  • IEMG offers higher dividend yield of 2.4% versus EEM's 1.8%
  • IEMG holds 2,853 stocks, including small-cap companies not in EEM

More from Saturday 31 October →