Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

What not to do as a CEO pushing AI? Call your workers losers

Plenty of CEOs are bullish on AI and have urged their employees to embrace it enthusiastically. A more unusual approach is to deride your workers as losers for not using AI enough. A new investigation this week from 404 Media shows how one CEO is reportedly not just pushing AI, but practically bullying his employees into using it to work more quickly. At Proton—the company behind the encrypted…

What not to do as a CEO pushing AI? Call your workers losers

When it comes to AI adoption in the workplace, some CEOs are taking an aggressive approach that may not be in the best interest of their employees. One such example is Andy Yen, the CEO of Proton, the company behind the encrypted email service ProtonMail. According to a recent investigation by 404 Media, Yen is not only pushing for AI adoption but is also bullying his employees into using it more frequently.

In a Slack exchange, Yen dismissed the idea of spending days testing new code for security issues before going live, calling it "bullshit and loser thinking." He emphasized, "Only losers think like that." Such aggressive language has left many employees fearful of expressing any concerns about security vulnerabilities with AI-generated code.

As one worker put it, "Whatever persona Andy Yen has out of Proton, he’s a straight up bully inside. He routinely breaks his little facade in Slack and calls people losers and stupid, often for stuff he’s paying them for."

While Yen may present a more cautious image of AI adoption to the outside world, the investigation reveals a different reality. Proton is actively forcing AI on its employees and penalizing those who don't eagerly adopt it. The company has even begun tracking the volume of AI-generated code used by its employees through software installed on their computers.

Yen has set up an email address for employees to alert leadership about anything that might hinder AI adoption, allowing the company to "ruthlessly smash everything that stands in the way of AI velocity."

This aggressive approach to AI adoption marks a significant shift from Proton's previous stance of banning AI use. Now, the company is tracking AI code usage and even considering replacing engineers with product managers who will work with AI. Previously, 404 Media reported that Proton planned to conduct "re-interviews" with employees about their AI usage, potentially leading to job loss. However, those interviews have since been canceled following the investigation.

The investigation highlights the potential negative impact of such a culture on employee morale and well-being. One employee expressed their concerns to Yen, warning that a fear-based culture feels like a cancer. Yen responded by suggesting that this might not be the right place for the employee. Companies like Proton must tread carefully when adopting AI, as an overly aggressive approach may backfire and negatively impact both productivity and employee satisfaction.

Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fastcompany.com →

More in AI

I priced my side project's LLM bill in 20 lines of JavaScript — here's the token math

I priced my side project's LLM bill in 20 lines of JavaScript — here's the token math Adding an AI summary feature to a side project cost me $156 a month at a volume I would have guessed was…

  • JavaScript code reveals LLM billing formula in 20 lines
  • Input tokens cost less than output tokens due to complexity
  • System prompt costs 20.5% of total bill despite being static

More from Friday 30 October →