'It isn't under control at all': Live Science readers respond to whether AI is making them lazy

Recent research presented at a conference suggests that relying on artificial intelligence (AI) assistance for tasks such as reading comprehension or math problems may diminish people's motivation when the AI support is no longer available. Live Science surveyed its readers to gauge their feelings on the matter. Out of the poll's 140 participants, 30% indicated they did not use AI at all, rendering the issue irrelevant to them.

A common sentiment among those who do use AI tools is that they make tasks more accessible but can also foster dependence. One respondent remarked, "But it isn't under control at all. It gets into your bank accounts and moves money without authorization. It encourages suicide and self-harm. It is addictive and makes people lazy."

Another added, "Use of all automatic aids decrease[s] attention and retention. I see it in the use of navigation devices where drivers ought to recognize routes after a couple of times. AI helps research and cuts down lengthy searches, but overuse of summaries weakens critical faculties."

While some argue that AI is merely a tool, others worry about its broader implications. "It encourages suicide and self-harm. It is addictive and makes people lazy," warned one commenter. Many respondents questioned whether the issue lies with AI itself or with an inherent inclination towards convenience. One reader asked, "Would you get the same results if the answers to all but a few problems were provided on a separate sheet of paper?"

Another quipped, "I think researchers should also investigate whether shovels decrease motivation to dig holes with one's hands. AI, like a shovel, is only a tool."

The discussion reflects a growing concern about the potential negative impacts of over-reliance on AI, prompting questions about the balance between leveraging technology for assistance and maintaining personal initiative and critical thinking skills.