Are you a stressed-out parent when it comes to your child’s education?
What parent type are you? Take this quiz to find out which profile fits you best.
A 2026 study by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) examines the attitudes of 1,500 parents with primary school children in Singapore. The research identifies three distinct profiles of parents based on their views about academic achievement, holistic development, parental involvement, and stress levels.
The profiles were created to help parents self-assess their approach to their children's education. It is important to note that this interactive tool is for public engagement and not a psychological assessment.
One key finding is that parents in one profile tend to assign a higher value to academic achievement compared to other priorities. These parents may also provide more homework or intensive tutoring to their children. They might feel anxious about their child's progress and worry about potential setbacks in their academic journey.
Another profile prioritizes holistic development and character building alongside academic success. These parents may offer more support in the form of resources, enrichment activities, or tutoring to ensure their child's overall well-being and growth.
The third profile focuses on finding a balance between academic goals and parental stress. Parents in this group prioritize their own well-being and that of their child, ensuring they have the necessary support and resources to navigate the challenges of primary school education. They believe in minimizing stress for their child while still pushing for academic excellence.
Regardless of which profile best describes a parent, the IPS study emphasizes the importance of open communication between parents and teachers. Understanding the efforts of the school and its educators can help parents make informed decisions about their child's education. Ultimately, the tool encourages parents to find a personalized approach that works best for them and their child.
Written by urgent.news from Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.