A Cynical Ploy to Block California’s Wealth Tax
Some voters who support the proposal might be duped into nullifying it.
California voters face a crucial decision this year: whether to approve a wealth tax on the state's approximately 250 billionaires. The ballot initiative, spearheaded by Dave Regan of California's health-care workers' union, aims to create a once-in lifetime 5 percent tax on all billionaire wealth, with proceeds earmarked for state health-care spending. However, opponents have devised a cynical strategy to potentially block the measure, even among some voters who support it.
The opponents have introduced Propositions 41 and 42, which may appear unrelated to the wealth tax but are designed to directly conflict with it. Proposition 41 mandates audit requirements for new special taxes and voids programs exempt from the state's spending limit, while Proposition 42 prohibits retroactive taxes and taxes on non-real estate property, both of which apply to the wealth tax measure.
These counterproposals exploit a feature of California law: if two conflicting ballot measures pass in the same election, the one with more votes prevails. This tactic allows the opponents to negate the wealth tax by ensuring it receives fewer votes, even if the majority of voters support it.
As a result, voters may face an overwhelming choice and resort to opposing all measures, or they might be unaware of the conflict between the measures and ultimately vote in favor of the counterproposals. Historically, similar tactics have been used to undermine ballot measures that challenge monopolies, but in this case, the outcome depends on voters' awareness and ability to discern the conflicts.
Written by urgent.news from The Atlantic's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
