Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Apple and OpenAI won't face off over trade secrets until July 2027

The judge has set up the schedule for the blockbuster Apple vs. OpenAI trade theft trial, and we'll all have to wait a while for it to really get going. Apple will get some of the OpenAI documents it requested in court. Judge Edward Davila has set the Apple vs. OpenAI trial for July 19, 2027, at 9 a.m. Both companies were given until October 23 to agree on a schedule. The dispute has roots…

Apple and OpenAI won't face off over trade secrets until July 2027

Apple and OpenAI have yet to clash over stolen trade secrets until July 2027, according to the latest court schedule. Judge Edward Davila has set the Apple vs. OpenAI trial to commence on July 19, 2027, at 9 a.m. Both parties were given until October 23 to agree on a trial schedule. The suit began in July 2026, when Apple accused OpenAI of poaching former employees Tang Tan and Chang Liu.

OpenAI denied Apple's claims, citing an email mix-up and a published open letter defending its hiring practices. Apple argues that OpenAI failed to adequately protect trade secrets, while OpenAI claims Apple introduced improper arguments during discovery. A June 1 deadline exists for attorneys to discuss a potential settlement, but this does not indicate a willingness to settle.

OpenAI provided forensic drive images from 14 former Apple employees, and Judge Davila granted additional discovery requests after narrowing the scope to relevant devices, messaging accounts, AI tools, recruitment interviews, and handling of confidential Apple information.

Written by urgent.news from AppleInsider's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at appleinsider.com →

More in AI

Evaluating Academic Review Methods: Comparing LLMs and Human Reviewers for Error Detection and Integrity

Technical Reconstruction of Academic Review Mechanisms: An Analytical Perspective Mechanisms The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into academic review processes introduces a paradigm shift…

  • LLMs excel at rapid error detection through pattern recognition.
  • Human reviewers provide deep conceptual critiques and qualitative feedback.
  • Hybrid approach combines strengths of LLMs and human reviewers for improved accuracy.

More from Thursday 29 October →