Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Why the world’s first spinal cord transplant is so controversial

A spinal cord transplant happened in people for the first time during a surgery in Russia, but the evidence underpinning it is lacking

Why the world’s first spinal cord transplant is so controversial

The pioneering neurosurgeon unveiled the world's inaugural spinal cord transplant, a move that has sparked significant controversy. The procedure, conducted in Russia, entailed removing a segment of the recipient's spinal cord and replacing it with a graft sourced from a donor. This landmark event marked the first-ever attempt of its kind, although there exists limited evidence to support its efficacy or the necessity of executing it at this particular juncture.

The decision to proceed with the transplant, despite the lack of robust evidence, raises ethical concerns similar to those faced by early medical innovators. For instance, Jonas Salk, the renowned virologist, who developed the polio vaccine, took considerable risks to advance medical science. Salk subjected his own family to the vaccine before it was widely tested on animals and children who had previously contracted polio.

While his actions accelerated the vaccine's development and saved countless lives, they also underscored the inherent dangers of pioneering medical interventions conducted in the absence of comprehensive evidence.

The transplantation of synthetic organs, such as tracheas made of plastic tubes, serves as another cautionary tale. Surgeons who performed these early operations often bypassed testing on large animals because of time constraints, resulting in complications and fatalities. These historical precedents suggest that while ambition and innovation are essential in medicine, they must be tempered with caution and rigorous evidence-based practice.

In the realm of experimental surgeries like the spinal cord transplant, the absence of extensive clinical trials poses a considerable challenge. Randomized controlled trials, while time-consuming and costly, are considered the gold standard for evaluating medical treatments. However, in urgent situations where the well-being of critically ill patients is at stake, compassionate-use protocols offer an alternative pathway to make innovative treatments available prior to full testing. An example of this approach is the ongoing trial of pig kidney transplants.

As humanity continues to strive towards achieving the dream of successful spinal cord transplants, it is imperative to build a robust scientific foundation before such procedures become commonplace. While courage, imagination, and the pursuit of dreams drive medical progress, evidence remains the bedrock upon which effective treatments are constructed. Only through diligent research and adherence to established protocols can we hope to realize the full potential of this groundbreaking therapy.

Written by urgent.news from New Scientist's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at newscientist.com →

More in Science

HEASARC Back Online

We are happy to report that the HEASARC web site and services are back online. The post HEASARC Back Online appeared first on NASA Science .

Why hugs become memorable

A large-scale survey of adults in the U.K. shows that hugs are commonly remembered for comfort, support and understanding, according to a study published in PLOS One by Anna Lena Dueren of the…

More from Wednesday 28 October →