Spotify Streaming Fraud Lawsuit That Claimed Drake Gets Billions of Fake Plays Dismissed by Judge

A class-action lawsuit accusing Spotify of allowing billions of fake bot streams for artists like Drake has been dismissed by a federal judge. The lawsuit, filed last year by rapper RBX, alleged that the music streaming platform turned a "blind eye" to streaming fraud, depriving many artists of fair royalties. However, Judge Josephine Staton rejected the lawsuit with prejudice on Monday, meaning it is now permanently over.

Staton wrote in her ruling that the lawsuit contained only vague allegations about Spotify's handling of artificial streaming, without specific details on how Spotify allegedly selectively enforced its policies. The judge stated that the lawsuit contained no other allegations about Spotify's selective enforcement of its policies against artificial streaming.

Spotify has previously claimed to have a "best-in-class system" for detecting, removing, and penalizing fake streams. The company pointed out that in a 2024 case involving an AI-powered streaming bot scam, only $60,000 of the alleged $8 million came from Spotify. However, in November 2025, lawyers for RBX claimed that Spotify's policies against fake streams were ineffective and that the company preferred to do nothing because bots helped increase the company's bottom line.

Despite Drake not being named as a defendant, the lawsuit took particular aim at him, repeatedly mentioning him as an example of the broader problem.