Bombay HC Pulls Up Civic, Police Authorities Over Delayed Air And Noise Pollution-Control Measures In Mumbai; Cites Enforcement Gaps

On October 26, 2026, the Bombay High Court scolded civic and police authorities for the sluggish implementation of directions aimed at reducing air and noise pollution in Mumbai. The court applauded the initiatives undertaken prior to Diwali but emphasized the necessity of effective enforcement. "The wheels of the official machinery turned too slowly for compliance," remarked a bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale, adding that Mumbai residents should enjoy clean and fresh air.

The court examined affidavits submitted by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB), and Mumbai Police Commissioner, expressing concern over the city's escalating toxicity and haze. The judges acknowledged that they had no objection to festivals but stressed the need for responsible celebrations.

They called for heightened public awareness, including campaigns in schools and communities, and criticized the lack of prominent advertisements and notices. Concerns were raised about the absence of dedicated telephone numbers for reporting violations and decibel meters to monitor noise levels. The court directed the authorities to establish accessible mechanisms for citizens to report violations without having to interact with multiple authorities.

Additionally, the bench emphasized the importance of enforcement in slum areas, where firecracker use and noise violations often go unchecked. The court directed the BMC commissioner, MPCB chief, and Mumbai police commissioner to collaborate with the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) and local municipal corporators to enhance awareness and enforcement at the grassroots level.

While acknowledging recent measures, such as newspaper advertisements and awareness campaigns, the court stressed that these efforts must be sustained and backed by deterrent action, stating, "Without any deterrents, nothing happens." The matter was posted for further hearing on November 25.