Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Two Dan Sullivans, one Senate seat? Trump wants Alaska vote on hold if… | Unusual executive order explained

Trump’s Justice Department seeks to block Alaska Senate election certification if Dan Sullivan loses, citing voter confusion over a similar-named candidate.

Two Dan Sullivans, one Senate seat? Trump wants Alaska vote on hold if… | Unusual executive order explained

The Trump administration has petitioned a federal court to halt the certification of Alaska's US Senate election if Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan is defeated, alleging that another candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, with a name nearly identical to the incumbent, could confuse voters and potentially sway the outcome of a crucial race that may impact Senate control.

The lawsuit, filed by the US Justice Department in Alaska, seeks to prevent the certification of the result if it is determined that votes meant for Dan Sullivan were inadvertently cast for Daniel J. Sullivan. President Trump personally approved the legal action, stating, "I’m the one that said ‘do it.’" The case has sparked debate over federal authority over state-run elections, the feasibility of proving voter confusion, and the extent to which the court can intervene in the administration's desired outcome.

The Senate race in Alaska has gained attention as Democrats aim to secure control of the chamber, needing to win four additional seats. Incumbent Dan S. Sullivan is contesting against Democratic candidate Mary Peltola, alongside Daniel J. Sullivan, a retired elementary-school teacher. The second Sullivan has denied attempting to mislead voters, stating his intention is not to trick people.

However, the Justice Department argues that the presence of the second Sullivan could undermine the election's fairness, requesting the court to declare unlawful the certification of a result affected by potential voter confusion and to delay certification until officials investigate whether votes for Daniel J. Sullivan were intended for the incumbent.

While election law experts have questioned the legal basis for the request, the administration maintains that protecting the integrity of the electoral process warrants federal intervention.

Brief written by urgent.news from Live Mint's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at livemint.com →

More in World

More from Saturday 24 October →