caveman vs ponytail vs Chisle: why I'd pick Chisle for Claude Code
If you've looked at cutting Claude Code's token use, you've probably found caveman and ponytail . Both are good. caveman makes Claude talk less. ponytail makes it build less. I started Chisle as a mashup of the two, and both are credited in the README. Here's why I think it's now the better pick. 1. It gives the shortest answers Same model, same prompts, only the ruleset changes. Answer length as…
In a recent development, Claude Code's token usage has been scrutinized, with two popular options - caveman and ponytail - standing out. However, the creator of Chisle, a new tool, argues that Chisle is the superior choice. Chisle is a mashup of caveman and ponytail, offering the shortest answers while not diminishing Claude's intelligence.
It accomplishes this by trimming token-heavy tool outputs before Claude reads them, resulting in a 46% reduction in token usage. Chisle is unique in its ability to publish the runs where it loses, providing transparency and credibility. It's a potent tool that offers less token usage, more concise code, and less tool reading, making it an ideal choice for AI coding agents.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- How I built a Mac app that hands your screen to Claude Code, Codex and Cursor dev.to
- I ran Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor on the same AI model, and the tool mattered more than I expected xda-developers.com
- Claude flags nearly 500 worrying open source security issues — C, Java, and Python code all at risk as one flaw wasn't spotted for 21 years techradar.com
- Top Anthropic engineer says Claude now writes 'literally all' her team's code businessinsider.com
