Charles Leclerc slams Isack Hadjar's Max Verstappen Ferrari claim as "nonsense"
Charles Leclerc has dismissed Isack Hadjar's suggestion that Max Verstappen would have won the Singapore Grand Prix by a bigger margin in a Ferrari, calling it "nonsense". The four-time champion dominated the race weekend at the Marina Bay Street Circuit, claiming pole position for the sprint and grand prix and winning both races. While he won by an impressive 7.3 seconds over Ferrari's Leclerc…
Isaac Hadjar sparked controversy by claiming that Ferrari possessed the fastest car and that Red Bull teammate Max Verstappen would have won the Singapore Grand Prix with an even larger margin if he had driven for the Italian team. Charles Leclerc, who placed second in the race, firmly dismissed Hadjar's assertions during a press conference at the US Grand Prix in Austin.
"It's nonsense to start saying these kinds of things. He has no idea what kind of car we drive, and I have no idea what kind of car he drives," Leclerc told reporters. Hadjar, who finished tenth in Singapore, maintained that the Red Bull car was still extremely challenging to drive, even despite Verstappen's recent victories. In Malaysia, he believed the Red Bull was dominant, but he didn't think it was the fastest car in Singapore.
"I believe if you put Max in the Ferrari, he would have won the race with a larger margin," Hadjar stated. Both Leclerc and McLaren's Oscar Piastri acknowledged Ferrari's strong performance in Singapore, attributing the team's superiority to their consistent pace throughout the year. However, Piastri noted that Ferrari struggled on the straights, and Red Bull appeared to be the most consistently quick car over the past few weeks. "Both are stronger than us for sure," Piastri said.
Written by urgent.news from New Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
