Most advice is right for the person giving it
Steve Jobs and Mark Cuban, two successful figures in their respective fields, both gave different, yet valid, advice to graduates at Stanford. Jobs encouraged following your passion, while Cuban suggested following your effort instead. Yet, they were both right from their own perspectives. Many instances of advice contradict each other, and two smart people can provide opposite recommendations.
To determine which advice is applicable to you, analyze the reason behind that advice. Understand the context and situation of the person giving it. Ask if the advice is applicable to your situation. It is essential not to presume that something that worked for someone else will be equally beneficial for you.
Understanding your 'wiring' – your natural tendencies, energy sources, decision-making process, and preferred environments – can help you discern whether advice is suitable for you. A simple three-minute personality assessment can offer insights into your unique wiring. This approach is crucial in making sound, personalized decisions.
Sometimes, the most straightforward answer is the best one. For example, when it comes to weight loss, the simplest advice is to consume fewer calories. Despite the numerous debates on diets and exercise regimens, a basic principle like this often proves effective. A well-known essay among programmers, called "Choose Boring Technology," advocates for choosing simple, reliable tools over flashy, complicated ones. This principle also applies to other aspects of life.
Developing a habit of testing advice in small, controlled experiments can help you make informed decisions. Before committing to a significant change, try a small-scale implementation and observe the results. This approach can save you from potential pitfalls and ensure your choices are data-driven.
Lastly, be cautious of charismatic certainty. People often mistake confidence for competence. To protect yourself from being swayed by persuasive yet misleading arguments, train yourself to develop an immune response to such statements. Question the actual evidence supporting the claims and consider seeking alternative perspectives.
Written by urgent.news from Hacker News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.