Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

More Than 1.5 Million Canadian Crime Stoppers Tips Leaked

A CBC investigation found that more than 1.5 million Canadian Crime Stoppers tips spanning 25 years were exposed in a breach of the P3 Global Intel tip-management platform. About 850,000 records contained personally identifiable information, including addresses, phone numbers, emails, license plates and some banking details. Longtime Slashdot reader doconnor shares the report: The data was stolen…

An investigation by CBC has revealed that over 1.5 million Canadian Crime Stoppers tips dating back 25 years were compromised in a breach of the P3 Global Intel tip-management platform. Roughly 850,000 records contained personally identifiable information such as addresses, phone numbers, emails, license plates, and some banking details.

The data was stolen last March by a hacktivist collective known as Internet Yiff Machine, who claimed it aimed to debunk P3 Global Intel's assertion that the platform was anonymous and secure. Researchers and journalists, including CBC, gained access to a copy of the stolen data through Distributed Denial of Secrets, a U.S. non-profit that archives and publishes hacked and leaked documents deemed to be in the public interest.

The report uncovered that more than 4,300 Crime Stoppers tipsters disclosed their full names, and numerous records contained staff warnings indicating individuals had self-identified or been exposed, yet their information remained unredacted.

Among the sensitive allegations in the leaked data were cases involving murder, terrorism, drug trafficking, and organized crime. Nearly 49,000 tips were connected to cases that resulted in arrests or criminal charges. Cybersecurity experts have expressed concerns over the retention of such outdated records, questioning whether closed tips need to remain online.

The RCMP was initially misled, believing Canadian data remained unaffected, but was later assured that exposed Canadian records contained no personally identifiable information. This appears to conflict with CBC's findings. Additionally, affected individuals have not been systematically notified due to the potential jeopardy to their anonymity.

Prof. Ali Dehghantanha, a cybersecurity expert at the University of Guelph, highlighted that a system designed to promise anonymity to users has failed categorically.

Written by urgent.news from Slashdot's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at yro.slashdot.org →

More in Tech

Reading static verification evidence: three exit codes, three review decisions

A passing command is useful evidence only when its meaning is clear. A static checker can complete successfully without running a test, observing production behavior, or proving that a software change…

  • Exit code 0 means successful completion without findings
  • Exit code 1 requires reviewer decision for identified issues
  • Exit code 2 indicates invalid or incomplete execution

Whitelist, not blacklist: why a launch bot should buy only what passes

Many open-source sniper and copy bots filter the same way: fetch the new launch, run a few checks, and skip it if something looks bad . Mint authority still active, skip. Creator rugged before, skip.

  • Whitelist approach avoided 92.2% of collapses compared to 89.3% with blacklist approach.
  • Whitelist filter must reject incomplete information, not treat it as potential success.

More from Wednesday 21 October →