⚖️ HackAVP : guide d'évaluation pour les membres du jury
❔ A propos Les soumissions du HackAVP sont closes depuis le 21 octobre à 23h59. Le jury met ses notes en commun le lundi 26 octobre (08h00-12h00 à la Stationn N) pour désigner les finalistes, qui pitcheront le 4 novembre à Tech&Co . Ce document de travail est destiné aux membres du jury. Commencez par le tableau ci-dessous : chaque ligne donne l'article, la vidéo de démo et la piste de l'équipe.…
This document, titled "HackAVP : guide d évaluation pour les membres du jury," provides guidelines for members of the jury involved in evaluating submissions for the HackAVP event. The submission deadline was October 21st at 11:59 PM. The jury met from October 26th, 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM at Station N to discuss and assign scores to the finalists, who will then present their projects on November 4th at Tech&Co.
The document begins with a table that lists each submission, its associated video demo, and the team's track. Each submission includes a project description, author, track, and a link. The evaluation criteria are outlined in two sections: Common Ground and Technicité, with a total score of 100 points.
In the Common Ground section (30 points), creativity and aesthetics are assessed (4 points), UX and usability (5 points), accessibility (4 points), adequacy of means and results (5 points), adherence to standards and Open Data (6 points), storytelling (4 points), and reusability and dissemination (4 points).
The Technicité section (25 points) evaluates the relevance of resources (8 points), integrability (8 points), maintainability (5 points), and an innovative interaction element (4 points). The Value of Human Resources (25 points) assesses the quality of matching (5 points), the quality of generated documents (5 points), the quality of presentation (5 points), ease of creation (5 points), and impact on decision-making (5 points).
Finally, the track assessment (20 points) considers the quality of the matching chain (4 points) and architecture, open-source frameworks, deployability, license consistency, and material deployment (2 points each). The document concludes with gratitude towards the jury and all participating teams.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.