Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

Seeking International Diversification? Is VT or IXUS a Better Core Holding for Long-Term Investors?

VT includes U.S. equities with a 30% tech weighting, while IXUS focuses on non-U.S. markets and offers a 3.0% dividend yield for income investors.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) are two popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that offer investors international diversification. While both funds provide exposure to non-U.S. markets, there are key differences between them that investors should consider when deciding which one to include in their portfolio.

VT offers broad exposure to over 10,000 stocks across developed and emerging markets, making it an all-in-one solution for global diversification. The fund's largest holdings include major technology companies such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, which together account for 31% of the portfolio. Additionally, VT has a modest yield of 1.5%, making it an attractive option for long-term investors seeking a balanced approach to international equities.

On the other hand, IXUS focuses exclusively on non-U.S. equities, offering investors the opportunity to gain exposure to a different set of companies and markets. Its largest holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics, and ASML Holding, which together make up 7.7% of the portfolio's value. IXUS boasts a higher yield of 3%, making it an appealing choice for investors focused on income generation.

However, it has underperformed VT in terms of price appreciation over the long term, with a 28.37% gain compared to VT's 50.2% gain over the past five years.

Investors should weigh these factors when choosing between VT and IXUS. If they have a diverse portfolio already, including U.S. equities, IXUS may be a suitable addition to provide geographical and sector diversification. However, if they are looking for a comprehensive solution to global equity exposure with a modest yield, VT may be the better choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to an investor's individual goals, risk tolerance, and existing portfolio holdings.

Written by urgent.news from Motley Fool's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fool.com →

More in Finance & Markets

New Oil Fields Should Have to Build the Carbon Storage Market

The debate over new oil and gas fields usually ends in a familiar deadlock. Industry argues that production will still be needed for decades, supports jobs and reduces dependence on imports.

  • New oil and gas fields should fund permanent geological carbon storage.
  • Requirement should be quantifiable, not vague or voluntary.
  • UK reassessment of Rosebank and Jackdaw fields demands binding carbon storage obligation.

More from Monday 19 October →