Britain’s lesson for Israel: The West Bank settlement policy has consequences - opinion
Israel can view the British move as a warning: a signal of what may happen in its relations with other countries if it continues to treat the West Bank as though it is free to do whatever it wants.
The closure of the British Consulate in Jerusalem has come to an end, with both Israel and Britain claiming victory in the dispute. Israel's decision to close the consulate came after Britain banned imports from Israeli settlements. The British government maintains that the consulate will not close, but will instead be known as the "UK Mission, Jerusalem," continuing its work with Palestinians.
Israel's decision was in response to Britain's policy, which may have been influenced by political pressure from Labour supporters. International law dictates that territory cannot be acquired through conquest, and occupation is temporary. Israel acknowledges this, but acts accordingly in territories it considers occupied since the Six-Day War.
The principle of international law regarding territorial acquisition and occupation remains a point of contention between Israel and Britain. Israel could continue to ignore such criticism, but another option is to view the British move as a warning of potential repercussions from other countries if it continues to treat territories and their inhabitants as it pleases.
Written by urgent.news from Jerusalem Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
