‘Livelihood is my right’: Delhi businesses count cost of protests, police restrictions
Traders in India’s capital told CNA that recent demonstrations and security curbs have hurt sales and footfall, raising questions over how to balance the right to protest with livelihoods.
During protests against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Delhi on October 10, 11 and 12, detained individuals have filed petitions in the Supreme Court alleging police misconduct. Lawyers Association for Constitution (LAFC) submitted a petition on October 10 and 11, expressing concerns over "serious and widespread police excesses" and demanding the resignation of the Chief Election Commissioner in Delhi.
The detainees claimed they were subjected to physical assaults, beatings, sexual abuse, and illegal detentions. Women protesters were particularly targeted, with some experiencing sexual assault by police personnel. Police failed to inform detainees of the grounds of their arrest, denied access to legal counsel, and selectively targeted individuals based on their appearance or perceived identity.
Internet services were suspended in the area, causing further disruption. At least 37 citizens provided responses to the petition, and the documentation process continued even as police continued their actions.
Written by urgent.news from The Hindu's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Petitions in Supreme Court allege police excesses during Delhi CEC protests thehindu.com
- Supreme Court dismisses Solomon Asamoah’s bid to overturn Sky Train ruling gbcghanaonline.com
- Metro curbs on police instructions; DMRC tells Supreme Court; offers ‘unconditional apology’ on contempt notice indianexpress.com
