Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Why Wingdings Fonts Break on the Modern Web (And How I Built a Unicode Engine to Fix It)

Back in 1990, Microsoft licensed a series of dingbat glyphs designed by legendary typographers Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes, packaging them directly into Windows 3.1 under the name Wingdings . For decades, we used them for playful typography and hidden easter eggs: typing J in Microsoft Word turned into a classic smiley face ☺ , and typing A produced a victory sign ✌ . In gaming communities…

The article discusses the issues with Wingdings fonts on the modern web and how the author built a Unicode engine to fix the problem. Wingdings, a series of dingbat glyphs licensed by Microsoft in 1990, were initially used for playful typography and hidden Easter eggs. However, due to the limitations of glyph substitution and lack of support on certain platforms, the Wingdings symbols fail to display correctly when copied and pasted into modern chat apps like Discord, Slack, or Twitter.

To solve this issue, the author developed a bidirectional Unicode engine using TypeScript and Next.js that directly maps Latin characters to their authentic Unicode counterparts, ensuring consistent display across various platforms and devices.

Brief written by urgent.news from Dev.to's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

Verifying Intel TDX and NVIDIA GPU attestation from inside a rented VM, and what it can't prove

I run a small confidential GPU cloud. We rent Intel TDX virtual machines with an H100, H200 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell passed through, and customers kept asking the only question that matters: how do I…

  • Voltage-verify tool verifies enclave authenticity inside rented VMs.
  • Manifest with random challenge used for kernel TDX interface quote verification.
  • NVIDIA GPU attestation via Remote Attestation Service, both proofs share same challenge.

What 64,000 gun store listings taught us about parsing product titles

If you compare prices across stores, sooner or later you have to answer a boring question: are these two listings the same product?

  • Researchers analyzed 64,000 gun store listings to develop a parser for product titles.
  • The parser outperformed NER models and LLMs in accuracy and cost efficiency.
  • The parser achieved 99.97% match rate for firearm models and 97.8% for ammunition calibers.

More from Tuesday 13 October →