Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

The Weekly Tally: 12 Rejected Outputs Told Me My Prompt Was the Bug, Not the Model

Last post introduced the decision log: every rejected LLM output in my n8n review queue gets one tag — **prompt , **fixture , **model , or **data * — and I tally them weekly. This week I actually sat down with three weeks of tallies. The pattern did what the SOP promised: it turned a vibe into a work order. Here's exactly what the tally said, and what I did about it.* What the tally looked like…

In a recent analysis of rejected outputs from an LLM in an n8n review queue, a reporter noticed a pattern that revealed the source of the issue. Over three weeks, there were 31 rejected outputs, with each output tagged as either "prompt," "fixture," "model," or "data." The report found that 55% of the rejections were due to the "prompt," 23% to the "fixture," 16% to the "model," and 6% to the "data."

The report concluded that more than half of the rejections were caused by the prompt itself, not the model or data. The report emphasized the importance of regularly reviewing and analyzing rejected outputs to identify patterns and potential bugs in the system.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

Agents Are For-Loops. That Is Good News for Security.

If agents were magic, we couldn’t secure them. They aren’t, so we can. AI agents are not magic. They are workflows with probabilistic decision-making and real-world privileges.

  • AI agents operate on observe-decide-act loop with language model decision-making
  • Security principles from distributed systems apply to securing AI agents
  • Secured for-loops with identity, short-lived, scoped authorization needed

More from Tuesday 13 October →