Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

US judge blocks Trump’s taxpayer-funded TV ads: Who is Jennifer Rochon, and why does her ruling matter?

Judge orders Trump administration to cancel taxpayer-funded promotional TV ads

US judge blocks Trump’s taxpayer-funded TV ads: Who is Jennifer Rochon, and why does her ruling matter?

A federal judge has ordered US President Donald Trump to halt the airing of any remaining taxpayer-funded television ads promoting his policies, according to a ruling on Sunday night. The temporary restraining order was granted following the airing of these commercials in late September, which received bipartisan criticism. The ads, featuring Trump's statements and warning against communism, end with a disclaimer indicating they were paid for by the US government.

New York District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon deemed the ads an illegal misuse of funds, siding with a coalition that includes the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause. The judge stated that defendants should not enter into, renew, or expand any agreements allowing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the contested advertisements for the next two weeks.

The court's decision came as the administration claimed the ad campaign was concluding, despite the Justice Department arguing in a court filing on Saturday that the temporary restraining order was unnecessary, as the problematic conduct would end the following day. The Department of Homeland Security had allocated $20 million (€17.8 million) in taxpayer funds for the ads in question.

Legal experts contend that the misuse of Congress-allocated money for publicity or propaganda, as well as other potential laws, is being violated. On Monday, Trump stated he considered the ads to be standard and a positive promotion for the USA, but they would no longer be taxpayer-funded. The White House announced that Trump's political action committee would fund the ads moving forward, but taxpayers would not be reimbursed for those already aired.

In a statement from Democracy Forward, a nonprofit organization representing the plaintiffs, it was emphasized that there is no legal basis or precedent for the president using government machinery and taxpayer funds to influence elections in line with his own agenda. The plaintiffs, comprising a public employee union and an Alabama state representative candidate, urged the judge to block the ads by Friday to prevent them from airing during weekend programming, such as football games and Saturday Night Live. Democrats have also contested the ads in a separate suit filed at a federal court in Washington.

Written by urgent.news from DW English (Top Stories)'s reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at gulfnews.com →

More in World

More from Monday 12 October →